Ares V SRBs could change radically

by | Nov 25, 2008 | Ares, Constellation, NASA | 2 comments

Ares V SRB.JPG

credit: NASA

The essentials of the above solid rocket booster (SRB) design are well known as the basis for both the Ares I crew launch vehicle’s and Ares V cargo launch vehicle’s first stages (Yes NASA is now calling the Ares V SRBs its first-stage)

However, the space agency is known to be considering HTPB as an alternate fuel and filament wound casings for the segments (and this composite SRB version might be expendable) but beyond that, and a nozzle extension for Ares I’s first-stage and the oscillation issues, the SRB design seemed broadly frozen. Until now

At the back of the RFI document that can be found via this latest press release it talks about what NASA wants contractors to do regarding the SRBs, and it seems to be a bit more substantial than you might have thought

That document, with a 25 November publication date, says, “The Contractor shall propose an upgraded performance solid rocket fueled booster approach for the First Stage Element to exceed the [point of departure] requirements in Table 8.2”

Table 8.2 has a total point of departure performance figure for Ares V of 187,700kg to a 240km (149miles) orbit

Quite a substantial change to the 130,000kg to LEO goal that NASA exploration launch project office’s advanced planning manager Phil Sumrall told me about at the 3rd space exploration conference this year, which in itself was an increase on the original 2005 Exploration Systems Architecture Study’s 125,000kg target identified on page seven of its executive summary

That 187mT figure had already caught my eye, on 20 November, (other than the human rating study for the core and Earth departure stage I blogged about) when the first version of this RFI draft statement of work was published; but what also peaked my interest, and led to an email to NASA, was this earlier version of the above text:

“The Contractor shall propose an alternate solid rocket fueled booster approach for the First Stage Element”

Alternate?!

I contacted NASA about this as alternate seemed quite strong. And before I saw the new 25 November version I got this reply from NASA’s Ares V integration manager Steve Creech:

“If you’ll remember charts we’ve shown at conferences on results of lccr (lunar capability concept review) our selected pod (point of departure) vehicle used shuttle-ares 1 derived srbs. We also showed alternative option of doing new booster to get more performance. Our guidance out of lccr was to study alternative booster options until the level 2 lunar srr (next year in june of 2010) so that we had a fall-back in the event that the architecture wanted more performance. Again, I’d emphasize this is an option we are studying – we have no intention of leaving the current ares 1 derived boosters at this time.

Thanks

Steve”

UPDATE 25 November 1900h GMT: Steve Creech sent the following regarding the 20 and 25 November wording changes, “We updated [the] language to make [it] clear that we were looking for what-if options that add performance, otherwise no reason to consider [them].”

So there you have it, just a “what-if” option, unless Constellation wants a tad more perfomance anytime soon, but one that makes you wonder, how radically can an alternate SRB approach be?

About Seradata

Seradata produce the renowned SpaceTrak Launch & Satellite Database. Trusted by 100 of the world’s leading Space organisations, SpaceTrak is a fully queryable database used for market analysis, failure/risk assessment, spectrum analysis and space situational awareness (SSA).

For more information go to www.seradata.com/spacetrak

Related Articles

Ares I is not dead, it’s just a test flight zombie

It sounds a bit like the Review of US human space flight plans' option 4A but there are some pretty Read more

NASA: Ares V cargo launch vehicle contracts imminent

NASA's Ares V cargo launch vehicle design support contracts were supposed to be awarded in the first week of April. Read more

And NASA’s Altair Lunar Lander is now….

The third Lander Design Analysis Cycle (LDAC) for NASA's Altair Lunar Lander is expected to finish next month (March). After Read more

More NASA Ares V cargo launch vehicle information

Find in the extended section of this blog post my notes from reading through NASA's Ares V cargo launch vehicle Read more

ARES V: NASA to assess human rated version

In a surprise move NASA has included studies to assess the human rating of the Ares V cargo launch vehicle's Read more

PICTURE: Ares V enters the wind tunnel

This schlieren photo depicts a wind tunnel test demonstrating air flow over the .331 percent model of the Ares V Read more

IAC 2008: VIDEO – Ares V briefing

At the International Astronautical Congress (IAC) 2008, held in Glasgow, Scotland, last week NASA's Ares V integration manager Stephen Creech Read more

Third stage for Ares V?

Hyperbola is a technology orientated spaceflight blog written by Flight technical editor Rob Coppinger

Cookies & Privacy

Click here to read about use of cookies on the website

Categories

Archives