Does this mean non-US ISS downmass commercial services?

by | Apr 21, 2008 | NASA | 1 comment

I only had 15min and had pushed on the issue of non-US commercial resupply services for the International Space Station if the contractors didn’t deliver so I just left the issue when NASA’s ISS programme’s transport office manager, Kathryn Lueders finally said: “The plan is secure all upmass through domestic services;” but the answer perhaps begs more questions?

secure all upmass through domestic services – but the ISS resupply request for proposals letter also has 34,500kg (75,900lb) of downmass required

Of that 8,000kg is downmass that has to be returned. The other 26,500kg can just burn up on reentry. From calendar year 2011 that trash is 5,000kg a year

My theory is that, NASA’s Commercial Orbital Transportation Services/ISS commercial resupply will not deliver in time all the logistical needs of the station, so when will NASA have to look around for replacement up/downmass capability?

For calender year 2010 NASA is expecting a need for 2,700kg of upmass, 500kg of downmass to be returned and 1,500kg of trash. Well an extra Russian Khrunichev Space Center expendable Progress could do this, OK maybe not 2,700kg but almost that much while admittedly it could not transport the 500kg of returned downmass. But then, no ISS commercial resupply with a heatshield and nothing is being returned intact

If I remember correctly there was quite a bit of build up on ISS during the grounding of the Shuttle fleet after the Columbia disaster but that was only for two crew, not six; looks like we’ll see that added storage need onboard again

When I asked Lueders how they calculated the resupply demand that was ISS logistics shortfall she said it was the difference between what was needed and the total capability of the barter agreement supply of European Space Agency Automated Transfer Vehicles (ATV), Japan’s H-II Transfer Vehicles and Progress and Russia’s Soyuz plus the planned purchases for Russia vehicles between now and 2011

But what’s the problem with extra Progress in the first six to possibly 18 months of commercial resupplies planned in-service date – I can’t remember if the Iran Syria noproliferation act waiver NASA has is up to and including 2011?

In 2011 and 2012 the lack of commercial resupply or a limited service is not going to help as “internal” upmass is 4,800kg and external upmass is 1,800kg with returned downmass tripling and trash downmass being 5,000kg in both years

Unless NASA considers ATV or a “last minute” change to Russian Progress cargo vehicle purchases commercial resupply will have to have demonstrated a good capability otherwise that station is going to get very cramped – and realistically both ESA and Roskosmos are going to have to give their industry two-years notice to comfortably deliver an assured service

So I wonder, when in 2009 will NASA know its got a potential problem with its contractors, having placed the contract(s) on 28 November this year?

Thinking through the timing and what I know of space programes’ industrial needs I’d say mid-2009 is going to have to be a decision date for ordering extra Progress at least

Come 2011 the 5,000kg of trash is going to become a lot more problematic. It’s not an amount you can just shovel around the ISS interior

But it is easily disposed of by an ATV, which can carry up to 7,600kg of nicely packaged dry cargo

In my humble opinion while NASA marches on believing it can find commercial resupply domestically it should really begin to think about back-up options and if Russia is too tricky with the US legal situation then western Europe’s ATV, now a proven resupply capability, should be the first port of call – pun intended

Then again, COTS and commercial resupply might go swimmingly well…

About Seradata

Seradata produce the renowned SpaceTrak Launch & Satellite Database. Trusted by 100 of the world’s leading Space organisations, SpaceTrak is a fully queryable database used for market analysis, failure/risk assessment, spectrum analysis and space situational awareness (SSA).

For more information go to

Related Articles

Is the full Orion crew exploration vehicle programme back on?

The Orion crew exploration vehicle looks set to return not only as an escape capsule but also as a beyond Read more

VIDEO: SpaceShipOne test pilot Brian Binnie talks

Scaled Composites SpaceShipOne test pilot Brian Binnie talks to Aero tv news network about commercial space

PICTURES: Boeing/Bigelow Aerospace commercial crew capsule

Released 2 February 2010 this is the Boeing/Bigelow Aerospace commercial crew capsule concept that is part of the Boeing company's Read more

COTS gets 60% hike in funds with total hitting $800 million plus

NASA's first commercial foray, the commercial orbital transportation services progamme, also known as COTS, has seen a 60% hike in Read more

Hyperbola says forget flexible folly, opt for national capability

There comes a point in any under funded period of transition when grandiose ideas about reaching langrange points and near Read more

What fate for NASA’s CCDev?

Is 9 December the day we'll find out who has been awarded funded space act agreements for NASA's Commercial Crew Read more

VIDEO: #iac2009 Civilian access to space session

Watch this video of the Internatonal Astronautical Congress in Daejeon, Korea where Virgin Galactic president Will Whitehorn, Sierra Nevada vice Read more

Space station docking standards are so popular this season!

As well as progress with the Orion crew exploration vehicle's LIDS NASA has informed Hyperbola that $15 million is to Read more