Is MIT dumbing down?

by | Dec 17, 2008 | Seradata News | 7 comments

hst sts61W445.jpg

credit: NASA/ caption: STS-61

Beyond these words NASA should continue to support commercial and European
development of crew and cargo alternatives
, particularly for cargo return, during and after the gap
the report by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology space, policy and society
research group
 is pretty unimaginative and if I were a member of George W. Bush’s administration or NASA’s current leadership I’d be thanking the New England based-institute for the free positive PRRather like this Obama campaign space policy and this report from the Obama linked Center for American Progress Action Fund New Democracy Project, the gravity free zone normally found in US Congressional authorisation acts for NASA that seem to think that a $25 billion plus (my guestimate) wish list can be done for $17 billion seems to have expanded to cover a major academic institution

The one shining light in the report is that commercial and European cargo reference. In ESA you have an organisation whose industrial partners have proven ability. Sadly at the moment Europe’s governments can’t, or won’t, invest enough to deliver additional upmass and down-mass capability in the near term. Obama could change that. Funding the crew transrpotation option of NASA’s commercial orbital transportation services demonstration programme would be a good idea too

As for the rest of the MIT report. I guess the university makes more money from human spaceflight projects than robotic space science as the recommendations in its report demonstrate a mindset that thinks that you can carry on as normal and have your human spaceflight cake and eat it while the scientific community (now looking for a big climate change dividend from the Obama administration after eight lean years) and aeronautics research base just rolls over

How can I make this clear enough for people even with multiple degrees to understand?

YOU CAN’T FUND ALL OF THE SPACE SCIENCE AND AERONAUTICS RESEARCH COMMITMENTS AND GO TO THE MOON ON A FLAT NASA BUDGET

Even if you opt for the “dump Constellation, worship at the EELV altar” crowd’s approach you are going to have to develop heavier lift EELVs, extremely reliable automatic in-orbit rendezvous and docking, an Earth departure stage, crewed and robotic cargo lunar landers, a cislunar navigation and telecomms network, lunar surface systems, lunar rovers, new spacesuits, in-situ resource utilisation technology and I choke while I say it, orbital propellant depots…

Can someone in American academia please get real [add whatever florid language you wish too] and draw up a realistic plan for the US space programme?

About Seradata

Seradata produce the renowned SpaceTrak Launch & Satellite Database. Trusted by 100 of the world’s leading Space organisations, SpaceTrak is a fully queryable database used for market analysis, failure/risk assessment, spectrum analysis and space situational awareness (SSA).

For more information go to www.seradata.com/spacetrak

Related Articles

XCOR goes under

With assets of less than US$10 million and liabilities of more than twice this amount, XCOR Aerospace filed for bankruptcy Read more

Will Fox news’ tea-parties get Obama and save Ares rockets?

Considering how NASA repeatedly fails to get any significant Congressional support for its programmes - president George Bush's failure to Read more

The New York Times: NASA Constellation vehicles animation

The New York Times website has an article about the challenge to NASA's Constellation programme from the change in administrations Read more

PICTURE: Click on Xcor engine image for larger version

Kindly provided by Xcor Aerospace click on this image for a gigantic version that can brighten up your desktop background

PICTURE: Xcor’s Lynx suborbital spaceship’s 5K18 rocket engine fired

Four of these 5K18 engines will power Xcor Aerospace's Lynx suborbital spaceship. Detail about Lynx's development can be read here

Follow Xcor’s announcement via Hyperbola’s twitter

At 1000h local time in California (1800h GMT) Xcor Aerospace has its press conference about its first customer, now known Read more

Damn Daily Mail! It is Per Wimmer but I did know that, honest…

Yes, as a P. W. Mothman has said in my comments, the Xcor customer is Danish born, UK resident Per Read more

EXCLUSIVE: Xcor’s first astronaut is…

Hyperbola has learnt that the first customer for Xcor Aerospace's Lynx suborbital vehicle is not American and is in fact Read more

Cookies & Privacy

Click here to read about use of cookies on the website

Categories

Archives