Not quite “Third time’s a charm” for SpaceX Spaceship prototype SN10 as it lands successfully but later explodes…and then SN11 falls out of the sky (Updated)

by | Mar 4, 2021 | Launches, Reliability Info, Seradata News, SpaceX

After two explosive landing failures with the SpaceX Starship prototypes SN8 and SN9, SpaceX engineer and commentator John Inspruker tempted fate again on 3 February for the SN10 test flight by saying “Third time’s a charm.”

SN10 ascends to 10km before its successful landing (even if it did later explode). Courtesy: SpaceX

At this point it was true that the SN10 test flight had achieved the object of its test flight: a high-altitude launch followed by a successful landing at its Boca Chica base in Texas. But several minutes after the landing disaster struck when the craft exploded.

The initial abort happened after a first ignition attempt failed. Minutes later, ignition was achieved and the test flight was successfully made to a planned altitude of 10km. The already perfected technique of a flat pancake orientated descent was then made to slow the Starship craft down. A last-minute pitch up to an engine down configuration also worked well.

This time there was no engine failure to prevent a slow touch down. And instead of just two, all three raptor engines were initially ignited. This increased the chance of having at least one working engine for the landing as during the fast-paced approach there would be little time to attempt an engine reignition.

The troubles started before the landing when an apparent loss of thrust in the braking engine caused a faster than planned touch down. This loss of thrust was later attributed to partial helium ingestion from the fuel header tank with bubbles causing a loss of thrust. The helium was added to keep propellant pressurisation of the propellants ahead of the landing, especially during the horizontal descent. The resulting crunching landing caused two of the Starship’s six deployed landing legs to collapse as well apart of the rocket stage’s skirt.

The partial leg collapse caused the safely landed Starship stage to start leaning over. It also had a fire burning beneath from an apparent propellant spillage. Eight minutes after its landing, the leaning Starship then appeared to have an explosion at its base, which made it jump up from the ground. After this unplanned “relaunch”, the lower structure then exploded with the stage falling back to Earth in flames.

In a news release, SpaceX used Elon Musk’s favourite terminology for an unexpected explosion: “As if the flight test was not exciting enough, SN10 experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly shortly after landing.”  The cause of the post-landing failure is being investigated. SpaceX is considering allowing the Starship to make the final landing on two engines instead of one in future flights.

The movie clip of the explosion can be seen here: Chris B – NSF on Twitter: “An amazing shot of Starship SN10’s post-landing Rapid Unplanned Disassembly (RUD) after Wednesday’s test flight. ➡️https://t.co/bOsEo1u0u0 https://t.co/FmNtYBFmIe” / Twitter

A still from NASASpaceflight.com’s movie clip of the SN10 post flight explosion. Courtesy: NASASpaceflight.com via Twitter

Update on 31 March 2021:  The follow-on test flight on 30 March, again at Boca Chica, the Starship prototype SN11’s flight was also seen to have ended in failure.  While observation of its launch was very difficult due to it being shrouded in heavy sea fog, its telemetry and on-board cameras showed that the launch to 10 km altitude worked as planned.  However, five minutes 49 seconds into the launch the coverage was cut. This was the point at which the three engines were due to be fired up for the descent.  An explosion is thought to have taken place with the carcass of the rocket stage plus some extra debris was seen to fall out of the sky and impact the ground near the planned landing zone.  As Chief designer and founder of SpaceX, Elon Musk, drily noted: “At least the crater is in the right place!”

Elon Musk later revealed that a “hard start” – a high pressure ignition event/explosion caused by too much propellant in the turbopump – had occurred in one of the three rocket engines. The cause is was due to a fire caused by methane fuel leak on Engine 2 during the ascent phase which “fried” part of avionics and which, in turn, led to the hard start.

About Seradata

Seradata produce the renowned SpaceTrak Launch & Satellite Database. Trusted by 100 of the world’s leading Space organisations, SpaceTrak is a fully queryable database used for market analysis, failure/risk assessment, spectrum analysis and space situational awareness (SSA).

For more information go to www.seradata.com/spacetrak

Related Articles

SpaceX carries out fourth Starlink mission of March and orbits 60 more satellites

At 0828 GMT on 24 March SpaceX successfully launched a Falcon 9 vehicle carrying 60 STARLINK satellites from Cape Canaveral Read more

Third Starlink launch in March puts another 60 sats into orbit and sets new rocket re-use record

At 1001 GMT on 14 March a SpaceX Falcon 9 launched from Kennedy Space Centre, Florida carrying 60 STARLINK satellites. Read more

US Space Force hands out four launch contracts: two apiece to ULA and SpaceX

On 9 March 2021 the US Space Force (USSF) awarded launch contracts for four upcoming missions planned to launch in Read more

Following a long series of delays SpaceX has managed to launch its lingering Starlink mission

On 4 March 2021 at 0824 GMT SpaceX successfully launched a Falcon 9 vehicle from the Kennedy Space Center, Florida, Read more

SpaceX successfully launches another Starlink batch but loses the first-stage during landing attempt (Updated)

Lifting off from Cape Canaveral, Florida, at 0359 GMT on 16 February, a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket carried the second Read more

NASA awards launch contract to SpaceX and orders a lunar lander from Firefly

A NASA announcement on 4 February 2021 outlines the award of the SPHEREx launch contract to SpaceX. SPHEREx (Spectro-Photometer for Read more

SpaceX completes another Starlink launch

At 0619 GMT on 4 February, SpaceX launched another 60 Starlink satellites into LEO. The mission saw a Falcon 9 Read more

US Senators plead with Biden for more money for NASA human lunar lander

With just over one quarter of the funding it needed from Congress (US$850 million versus the US$3.2 billion requested) for Read more

Cookies & Privacy

Click here to read about use of cookies on the website

Categories

Archives