NASA chooses SpaceX Starship derivative for human lunar lander but was choice forced by limited funding?

by | Apr 17, 2021 | exploration, NASA, SpaceX, Technology

As Elon Musk had hinted on his Twitter feed, NASA formally announced on 26 April that it had selected SpaceX to provide a Human Landing System (HLS) for its Artemis Programme. The US$2.89 billion contract covers the development of the lander and a demonstration mission. SpaceX will be using its tall Starship rocket design, making it reminiscent of what science fiction writers and film makers in the 1950s believed a lunar lander would look like. The lander would be launched by the firm’s Super Heavy booster. It would then be refuelled in low Earth orbit by another launched Starship before proceeding to the Moon.

It is still envisaged that the human crew will fly separately to a high lunar orbit on the Orion spacecraft/service module launched by the SLS rocket. The crew would then transfer into the lander or do so via the Lunar Gateway space station. After the landing, the crew would ascend back into lunar orbit and onto the Orion for return to Earth.

SpaceX had been in competition with Blue Origin’s National Team and a team led by Dynetics. Both had different design concepts from SpaceX and from each other. It was originally envisaged that NASA would pick two of the three teams to go forward in an “Option A” run-off. However, the US Congress only granted NASA US$850 million in funding for FY2021 and so NASA found itself having to choose just one. Furthermore, it had to choose the cheapest and most developed option: SpaceX.  The SpaceX bid was half the price of Blue Origin’s bid of nearly US$6 billion. Nevertheless, the choice remains controversial. The technical rating for the SpaceX design was just “acceptable” whereas Blue Origin’s more traditional lander design was rated “very good”.

Update on 29 April: Both Blue Origin and Dynetics have filed formal protests to the US Government Accountability Office over the way the HLS contract was awarded.

The Winner: SpaceX Starship-based Human Landing System (HLS) for NASA. Courtesy: NASA

Comment by David Todd: Having such a tall lander will present problems in terms of balance and control during the landing. Significant design changes will need to be made to Starship if it is to be made into a viable lander. For example, aerodynamic control surfaces play a key role in stabilising the craft during its approach for landings on Earth and these will not be available on the Moon. Worse, we have major doubts about the wisdom of using cryogenic fuels whose storage and transfer technologies are yet to be perfected. It is not the plan we would have chosen if a landing by 2024 is to be achieved. That would have involved a much simpler storable propellant lander (plus transfer stage) launched towards the Moon on a translunar trajectory by a SpaceX Falcon Heavy/ICPS upper stage combination.

About Seradata

Seradata produce the renowned Seradata database. Trusted by over 100 of the world’s leading Space organisations, Seradata is a fully queryable database used for market analysis, failure/risk assessment, spectrum analysis and space situational awareness (SSA).

For more information go to https://www.seradata.com/product/

Related Articles

Categories

Archives

Tags

nasaspacexecoreviewsissesaArianespacevideochinaFalcon 9v1.2FT Block 525virgin galacticULAfalcon 9RoscosmosevaDGAspacewalkaviation weekaressoyuzIGTInternational Space StationBeidouawardsRocket LabBlue OriginspaceStarlinkSatellite broadcastingrussiamoonAirbus DSISROCargo Return VehicleboeingmarsblogresearchOneWebspaceshiptwojaxaorionmarsimpactdelayhyperbolaEutelsatdemocratrocketlunarhypertextobamagoogle lunar prizelaunchVegabarack obamaconstellationSEStourismnorthfiguresthales alenia spacespaceflightnode 2fundedRaymond LygoIntelsat2009Lockheed MartinExpress MD-2Elon MuskAtlas Vromess2dassault aviationaviationLucy2008wk2sstlukradiomissilesuborbitaldocking portexplorationAriane 5 ECAVirgin OrbittestinternetLong March 2D/2sts-122Ariane 5Northrop GrummanSLSChina Manned Space EngineeringElectronflightspace tourism2010cotsnewspapermissile defensegalileospaceportExpress AMU 1Long March 4Cbuildspace stationaltairsoyuz 2-1aProton Minternational astronautical congressshuttlespace shuttleEuropean Space AgencyLauncherOneCosmosIntelsat 23scaled compositeshanleybudgetrulesnew yorkAriane 6shenzhouatvVietnamcongressMojaveboldenLong March 2COrbital ATKInmarsatcnesnew shepardiaclunar landerGuiana Space CenterkscApollolawsSpace Systems/LoralUK Space AgencyLong March 4BKuaizhou 1AILSprotonUS Air ForceTalulah RileydarpaElectron KSFalcon 9v1.2 Block 5Vega CeuAstriumSkylonpicturebaseusaastronautdragonlanderfiveeventTelesatNorth KoreaSSLAprilSNC50thinterviewLong MarchSea LaunchfalconWednesdaycustomerlinkatlantissuccessor