Why does Augustine’s EELV option seem suspicially Ares-like?

by | Dec 14, 2009 | commercial launch services, exploration, Technology | 4 comments

It’s a question to ask when you consider that Norman Augustine’s report says on page 92:

The [Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle]-heritage Super Heavy Option 5B has an edge in technology, because it includes a new US developed large hydrocarbon engine,

Why is this important, because the report says on page 69 that “Using the EELV to launch the Orion [or any capsule this blog imagines] would only make sense if it were coupled with the development of an EELV-heritage super-heavy vehicle for cargo launch”?

Does that mean that the much touted EELV crew launchers such as Atlas V would need such a new hydrocarbon engine? Hydrocarbons, namely engines that burn kerosene with liquid oxygen, much beloved of the Russians, are first stage engines. The link that Augustine is making between an EELV crew vehicle launcher and a cargo booster is essentially the same that existed between Ares I and Ares V

And sure enough on page 67 Augustine says: “The upgraded EELV systems would have a core vehicle that would, by itself, have a launch capability to low-Earth orbit in the range of 30 to 35 [metric tonnes]”

Thirty five metric tonnes, sounds enough for one of these core stages to loft a chunky Orion crew and service module, and all thanks to this wonderful new hydrocarbon engine – but who would make it?

Interestingly on page 37 of the 2008 NASA authorisation act it stated that the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) should produce a report for Congress on the US rocket engine industrial base. It was supposed to be delivered in January of this year but by July Hyperbola was being told by OSTP that “The interagency review is ongoing and progress has been made. But it is not complete and I can’t predict how much longer it will take.”

It is now December and you would imagine that such a report could be quite important for such a decision on EELV or Ares, or any of the crew transportation options. At the moment there are basically three US companies offering powerful hydrocarbon engines, Space Exploration Technologies’ (SpaceX) Merlin engine, Aerojet’s Russian NK-33 originated AJ26-xx variants and Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne’s  own P&WR RS-27A (however this Delta II main engine on its own will not have the power needed for Augustine’s proposals) and the Russian Energomash RD-180, RD-120

Or is this OSTP rocket engine industrial base report being held back for one reason? The SpaceX Falcon 9 maiden flight perhaps?

New hydrocarbon engines, core stages with 35,000kg to LEO capabilities, does it begin to sound like the EELV option Augustine considered is a very long way from the “we just need an emergency detection system” for Atlas V argument from EELV proponents?

This preference for an “EELV-heritage” vehicle and not a straight EELV booster could explain why for the Delta IV Heavy option for crew launch Augustine’s report said: “launch of the Orion on the Delta IV HLV was found to be technically feasible, it…was comparable in cost and schedule to simply continuing with the development of the Ares I [crew launch vehicle].”

Ouch, Ares I is no advert for cost savings the Augustine report gives a figure of $6 billion for its completed development on page 90. And that harsh cost estimate for Delta sounds odd because at the Augustine panel’s 17 June meeting the Aerospace Corporation reported that Delta IV HLV is cheaper than Ares I to get to ISS and would take 5.5 to 7-years to be human rated

Has the Augustine report set existing EELVs up to fail?

Why does the report use harsher language for the Delta IV HLV for crew transport than was presented by Aero Corp back in June? And why does it go on to ignore the simpler evolution path of the Delta IV for a super heavy with a new upper stage and extra solids to achieve 50,000kg to LEO, Augustine’s own exploration minimum using propellant depots? Are extra solids and a new upper stage so much worse than a new family of “EELV-heritage” vehicles with this 35,000kg capable core stage?

And then Hyperbola is being told that EELVs had been touted as the mystery booster by Augustine panel members during talks with industry, which makes even less sense with the report’s statements in mind. And even more so when this blog is hearing rumous that SpaceX’s Falcon 9 could be the mystery booster first choice

But for a really bizarre twist the Augustine report says this, “the EELV-heritage super heavy vehicle would use the Russian RD-180 hydrocarbon fueled engine, currently used on the Atlas V…In the cost analysis…provision was made for the development of a large domestic engine to replace the RD-180 for NASA…missions.”

For a rocket that is a bit like saying we’ll build this house and then later we’ll change its foundations. Bizarre

And just to well and truly end any hopes for this “EELV-heritage” vehicle Augustine’s report says: “Because of these realignment costs [workforce, facilities closures, mothballing], the EELV-heritage super heavy does not become available significantly sooner than the Ares V”

Phew. Compared in cost to Ares I and compared to Ares V in terms of schedule. Could it get any worse? 

About Seradata

Seradata produce the renowned Seradata database. Trusted by over 100 of the world’s leading Space organisations, Seradata is a fully queryable database used for market analysis, failure/risk assessment, spectrum analysis and space situational awareness (SSA).

For more information go to https://www.seradata.com/product/

Related Articles

Luna 25 lunar crash failure report: engine shutdown signal was never sent due to control system overload

The Russian space agency/industrial conglomerate Roscosmos has released its preliminary report into the crash of Luna 25 onto the surface Read more

IAC 2023 Baku: Axiom Space talks about its plans for a space station to follow the ISS

The first Plenary Session of the second day here at the IAC 2023, Baku, Azerbaijan, saw a discussion between three Read more

Eutelsat completes merger with OneWeb to create European GEO-LEO giant

French satellite operator Eutelsat Communications SA and UK government part-owned OneWeb have completed an all-share merger, to create Eutelsat Group, Read more

Fears mount for Chandrayaan-3 lunar lander and rover while India hangs on for a signal

Contact has been lost with India’s new Vikram lunar lander and Pragyan lunar rover after they suffered a very cold Read more

OSIRIS REx returns asteroid sample to Earth and prepares for its next asteroid mission

The OSIRIS-REx mission to the asteroid Bennu has returned samples to Earth, fulfilling one of its main objectives seven years Read more

Galactic Energy of China suffers first launch failure of its Ceres-1 rocket losing insured Jilin 1 Gaofen 04B-01

The Ceres-1 Y11 launch ended in a total loss, marking the first failure for Galactic Energy, a private Chinese space Read more

Chinese Ceres-1 rocket performs first sea launch carrying four smallsats into orbit

At 0934 GMT on 5 September a Ceres-1S rocket built by Chinese company Galactic Energy successfully lifted-off from a modified Read more

India’s Chandrayaan-3 mission makes history with successful Moon landing

India has become the first nation ever to land a spacecraft near the South Pole of the Moon, as well Read more

Multiple launch orders for Rocket Lab from BlackSky, Synspective, and NASA (Updated)

On 8 August 2023, Earth Observation (EO) imagery provider and satellite operator BlackSky contracted with Rocket Lab for five further Read more




nasaspacexecoreviewsissesaArianespacevideochina25virgin galacticfalcon 9ULAFalcon 9v1.2FT Block 5RoscosmosevaDGAspacewalkaviation weekaressoyuzIGTInternational Space StationBeidouawardsspaceBlue OriginSatellite broadcastingRocket LabStarlinkrussiamoonCargo Return VehicleboeingOneWebAirbus DSmarsblogISROresearchorionspaceshiptwojaxaimpacthyperboladelaymarsEutelsatdemocratrocketobamahypertextgoogle lunar prizelunarlaunchVegabarack obamaconstellationSEStourismnorthfiguresthales alenia spacespaceflightnode 2fundedRaymond LygoIntelsat2009Lockheed MartinExpress MD-2Atlas Vromess2Elon Muskdassault aviationaviationLucy2008wk2sstlukradiotestmissilesuborbitaldocking portexplorationAriane 5 ECAVirgin OrbitinternetChina Manned Space EngineeringAriane 5SLSsts-1222010flightspace tourismNorthrop Grummancotsnewspapermissile defensegalileospaceportExpress AMU 1Long March 4CLong March 2D/2Electronbuildspace stationaltairinternational astronautical congresssoyuz 2-1ashuttleProton MEuropean Space AgencyLauncherOneCosmosIntelsat 23scaled compositeshanleybudgetrulesnew yorkAriane 6shenzhouspace shuttleatvVietnamcongressMojaveboldenLong March 2COrbital ATKnew shepardInmarsatGuiana Space Centeriaccneslunar landerksclawsSpace Systems/LoralUK Space AgencyLong March 4BILSUS Air ForceprotonTalulah RileyApollodarpaFalcon 9v1.2 Block 5Kuaizhou 1AVega CSkylonAstriumeupicturebaseusaastronautdragonlanderfiveeventTelesatSSLElectron KSNorth KoreaAprilSNCWednesdayinterviewSea Launchfalcon50thcustomerlinkLong Marchatlantissuccessor